...can a drug that is supposed to be so safe, really be so dangerous? The implications are horrendous, either way, for all those taking Ivermectin for cancer.
I like both Dr. Yeadon and Dr. Tess Lawrie, and while I side with Dr. Tess Lawrie in large part, I believe that Dr. Yeadon does make a good point in saying that ivermectin is significantly correlated with infertility and reduced fertility especially when used for more than two days. The research is convincing but not conclusive. It is probably true. In most cases the benefits of ivermectin are worth the trade-off, especially for people over 40. Young people should be warned about this likelihood.
They are dead serious. IVM threatens Big Pharma and the disease model. What they did to Ivermectin, they have been doing to vitamin D for decades. Think about this,... D3 insufficiency exists worldwide. How is that possible when deficiencies around the world have been established decades ago? https://ohbaby.substack.com/p/what-you-thought-you-knew-of-d3-hardly
It's clear that many people are unaware that the FDA grants a three-year exclusivity period for new cancer drugs like ivermectin. If ivermectin is applied as a new cancer drug for a new indication, the applicant can secure this exclusivity period, potentially leading to revenues exceeding $10 billion.
It's also clear the majority of FDA funding comes from the Industrial Medical Complex aka Big Pharma. It will never happen. You could bet the house on it.
IVM lost its patent and cost pennies on the dollar. There is no profit to be made. It cost more to package the tablets than to produce the drug. Maybe they can alter the drug and create a new patent? I don't know.
But even still, it would be too much of a huge hit on the cancer industry which is big business.
>>We can trust the millions around the world who have used Ivermectin and who
>>recover with no ongoing health damage, to tell the truth about what healed them.
OK, so why does anyone need to waste more time and effort trying to shame Yeadon (or any other 'big name') into coming clean and doing some 'splainin? No more deferring to "so-called" authority. He's tipped his hand. There's lots of different levels to this psyop, and they have have them stacked high and layered deep - so that if discerning and open minds make it past several, there are always several more that look a little different - already in place; ready to capture and derail them.
We're just going to have to crowdsource the truth and follow our own inner guidance on what works and what doesn't. Not everyone will get it right, or get to a good answer for it in time - but them's the breaks. Sadly, the Darwin awards go out every damn minute of the day for people whose powers of discernment and/or timing were just a little tiny bit off...
"Why does anyone need to waste more time and effort trying to shame Yeadon...?"
Because he is using his 40 years of expertise to spread disinformation. Oh,.. I'm a former Big Pharma exec, in charge of blah, blah, blah, so I know... Dr. Yeadon misleading that church group, saying there is no virus and Ivermectin is toxic, could be very harmful. Strangely, it reminds me of Jim Jones and the "Jonestown" event.
Yup. When nothing and no-one can be trusted for the expertise they are supposed to have any more, we are in a sorry state. We are in a complex society that requires specialties. We cannot each know everything we need to know. We employ an electrician to fix our wiring. We have to learn from specialists, and there is the problem. Which specialists can we actually trust. None it seems, so we are all have to turn ourselves, rapid fire, into oncologists. That’s not going to end well for most of us.
No, it probably won't. And that really sucks. But it's where we're at. We're going to have to all become very versatile 'generalists' in a hurry, and quit outsourcing all the knowledge to 'specialists'. Depending on who programs it (of course), and how well they did so, having the relatively unbiased assistance of a good general AI to help collate all the information that's out there already, like you've done, may be a saving factor.... I think I recall Mike Adams at Natural News & his team started working on a specialized AI knowledge assistant to locate natural cures. Haven't looked in on that in a while. Might be at a stage by now where it's at least semi-usable by the general public ...
One reason I am openly publishing my own journey with ill health, is that, even if I get it wrong, I am adding to the people centred database out there of what works and what does not.
I just got the provisional all clear from my cancer surgeon today. We cannot know, for any individual, whether the anti-parasitic protocols did anything at all, but we can know that they might. I am 9 months down the track from a melanoma excision where margins were left behind, at which stage I started taking anti-cancer protocols, and 3 months down the track from a breast cancer lumpectomy where margins were also left behind. There is currently no evidence of regrowth of either tumour, and no evidence of metastases. From here apparently, I have an 80% chance of no recurrence. I have to make up my mind whether to stay on therapeutic doses of anti-cancer protocols, or drop to maintenance doses, or change tack altogether to self-administered metabolic treatments based on mitochondrial health - all without the help of a practitioner, and only AI to help me sort out a the most cost effective long term protocol. A bit of intelligent human help would be nice, but it is not out there to be had.
(PS, I see you are into the woo. That is what has gotten me through this period of my life, and I have been having to trust my intuition like never before.)
>>I just got the provisional all clear from my cancer surgeon today.
Fantastic news! I am very glad to hear that. You are a very strong woman and your persistence has paid off ! I guess you've probably seen Uncle Clif's several pages of notes on beating cancer with things like fenben, etc. If not check out his 'stack...
I think being one with the 'woo' is our original natural state, but one that has largely been programmed out of 'normies' over the centuries. I've been cultivating my intuition for many years. It isn't always right, or right on time, but I have found that the more you trust it, the better it gets over time...
Yes. When we are confronted with cancer, we realise very quickly whether or not we are reconciled with death, and we realise very quickly that there is no-one there to save us, except whatever is represented by our own intuition. I learned, through this episode, that my intuition often speaks to me through the voice of a small child or belligerent teenager. It’s not often sweet and refined and oozing spiritual ascendancy when the sh** hits the fan.
The cancer industry and the sickness industry generally, forces us to make uninformed life or death decisions on the fly. This is when my spoilt child voice takes over and I can seem churlish or apparently irrationally stubborn, with my reaction to whatever I am being pressed into doing against my will. Even I do not know why I am turning into a donkey defiantly refusing to move or accept or do anything they want.
But it seems to have worked and so far has navigated me back out of ICU with what they called covid and now back out of the threat of two different cancers going rogue throughout my body.
My most critical learning through this time is to trust those apparently immature voices. to step back from the medical bullies, and take my own good time to let the problem sit until I wake up with a clarity on my course of action - even if that takes months with doctors telling me I will die if I take even hours or days. I’m still here. I WAS RIGHT! THEY WERE WRONG.
Now I just have to keep it up. I have to stop the old cancers from re-growing, I have to stop new cancers from growing, and I have to “cure” whatever this accursed long covid is.
>>my intuition often speaks to me through the voice of a small
>>child or belligerent teenager. It’s not often sweet and refined
>>and oozing spiritual ascendancy when the sh** hits the fan.
LOL - mine is never sweet either - and it often talks junk to me if I'm fixing to do something I shouldn't. But it probably needs to, in order to get my attention. Just keep listening and yours will keep guiding you.
Ivermectin works for whatever covd is. My holistic MD, yes a MD, had one of his patients take it in the hospital because she was dying and couldn't breathe. Her husband snuck it in to hospital. Then when she got out they tried to take his license away and the doctor had to go to court. The lady showed up and said he saved her life. End of story. He got to keep his license. Shame on everyone who turned this Holistic MD in. It is her body and she has the right to say yes or no to ivermectin. She won!
Considering that Big Pharma and the blackmailed medical profession have been poisong humanity for decades I would put my money on Michael Yeadon
I have 3 dead family members and a 2 dead friends and a daughter injured by vaccination in her teens leaving her with SLE and her body destroyed by steroids
A lot of us were putting our money on Michael Yeadon, but also Tess Lawrie, so to find the two of them at loggerheads is shocking. The study Yeadon uses to prove his point is clearly a nonsensical research study, as so many of the recent ones are, and he should have been able to see. It is impossible that he could not see the fallacies in the study. Even non-medical people like myself can tear the study apart, and Tess Lawrie has done just that.
In the very early days when we first started getting sick with something and dying, Tess Lawrie told us that she had been using Ivermectin to treat cancer - long before supposed covid - and she noticed that her cancer patients, already with compromised immune systems, were fighting off supposed covid symptoms with ease and none of them got seriously sick or hospitalised. She put 2 and 2 together, realised that the ivermectin was treating whatever covid was and started using it on her non-cancer patients as an early treatment. I don't know the source of this story now - it was too long ago, but as Tess Lawrie is one of the few doctors on the scene who have not proven themselves to be everything bad, stupid, dishonest, or straight out evil, I don't want to let go of my last remnant of trust in the human race.
I can tell that the research paper in question is seriously compromised so why is Mike Yeadon using it to attack Tess Lawrie. It makes no sense.
You can deny it but your whole article is touting ivermectin to treat cancer. You have no proof whatsoever. The rulers of the world are preventing research of all kinds that needs to be done, allowing only that which supports their narrative. You need to look at evidence yourself and not rely on “experts” to do the work for you.
So let's clarify what you are saying. It is up to cancer patients who are unable to afford specialist cancer care, to read and interpret all the serious medical studies pertaining to the of-the-shelf treatments we can access for ourselves, and sort which is honest and which is ludicrous? This is no longer the job of the medical professionals? And when we try to do just that, and find the medical professionals are all tearing one another to shreds in public spats, with what any moron can see are spurious arguments, we, who have no choice but to self-medicate, have to wade through their nonsense to find out what is truth and what is lie? This is no longer the job of the medical professionals? And we have to adjudicate while these medical professionals behave like spoilt brats, unable to take their disputes into a private forum and resolve them like we once though all professionals were able to do? It is no longer a requirement for a medically trained person to behave like a grown-up, let alone a professional and educated grown up?
Sure. You must be so proud to belong (if you really do) to such a debased profession.
And just as an aside, I have chosen not to use Ivermectin to treat my two different cancers that developed after a two week stint in ICU with what was called covid. But I know many who are, and they don't need clearly disturbed human beings like Mike Yeadon smashing their hopes without giving them an alternative. He might be right about Ivermectin. I have no way of knowing, and nor do any of the ordinary people forced to self-medicate for turbo cancers, but I do know he has no right to smash peoples faith in a treatment, supported by clearly substandard research, without giving them an alternative.
I’m not taking responsibility for the whole medical profession. I was shocked that the vast majority of doctors I was still in contact with (I retired long ago) went along with the obviously false Covid narrative and that they allowed themselves to be injected, and in many cases encouraged their patients and others to be injected. The reasons why they did that could certainly fill many books.
Clinical MD’s are not the drivers of new cancer treatments. That unfortunately is in the hands of large institutions like the NIH and large pharmaceutical companies because the costs are so high. The federal institutions are certainly captured and corrupt, and many, if not most of the pharmaceutical companies are as well. So we can’t rely on them. That leaves us with various medical freedom luminaries, many of which have an extraordinary output of material that makes one wonder how that all gets done. They line up all over the place, from Ardis with his snake venom theories, McCullough who was opposing the vaxx for the young but advocating it for the elderly (I attended a talk by him in late 2021 when he did just that), to Kory who came from nowhere to be brought to the US Senate to advocate for IVM, but when one looks at his timeline exactly it makes no sense. If the rulers of the world decided to have a major depopulation event and do it with injections and poisoned “drugs”, would it surprise you that they would place a few of their chosen misleaders into the movement of people they knew would develop in opposition to their plans? I can’t say for sure exactly what role Yeadon or Lawrie are playing. I’ve read much more of his stuff than hers but I take nothing as gospel and recommend the same to others. Is it difficult to read a scientific article and come to a conclusion? Yes, it often is, but unfortunately you and I have no alternative than to try to read those tea leaves and decide for ourselves. A new dimension has been added because of the blanket propaganda we are facing and the fact that many (most?) editorial boards of scientific journals appear to be corrupt as well. I agree with you that as far as cancer patients are concerned they have been put in a very difficult position, which I think is probably by design. Especially as I think the injections are causing a large amount of cancer and that that may well increase. Finally, I stand by my recommendation not to depend on any of these “heroes”.
You cannot impute from anything I have said that I rely on any heroes. I have been slamming them all for months in my posts. I would like to think that maybe one of them is honest, intelligent and telling the truth, but i have yet to see the evidence of that.
Because of severe censorship anecdotal evidence is what we are being limited to having as a way to evaluate phenomena at the present time. That does not make it reliable. Common sense should make one seriously question any drug that is being touted to treat viruses effectively and then marching on to treat cancers of all shapes and sizes and hue. Additionally, internet appointed “luminaries” such as Kory, McCullough, Malone, and others, clearly fifth columnists helping get the shots into the arms, have been the biggest proponents of IVM. You have made a lot of claims in this article about the usefulness of IVM in treating late stage, hospitalized Covid patients, but you have offered zero proof, not even a single anecdote. Furthermore, every single claim you offer that it treats cancer is qualified by “may”, “reputed to”, “thought to be” kind of qualifiers, without exception. That means absolutely nothing and raises a great deal of suspicion, as it should. I find your arguments unconvincing at best, and probably deceiptful. This is being written by an MD who treated scores of people of with IVM but quickly realized “Covid” itself required no treatment by IVM, and explained to patients that we were hopefully treating “Long Covid”. When I began to see visual disturbances caused by IVM I stopped using it altogether. Those had not been reported in the internet literature so I was quite surprised. You are joining Chris Cuomo in touting IVM. Look in the mirror and question what you are up to!
I'm not touting anything. I am telling the supposed experts to grow up, stop bickering like 5 year olds, and get on with providing reliable advice to those of us dying without any kind of competent medical help. The last thing that seems to matter to any of you is sick people. We pale into insignificance in the blinding light of your ego battles.
Seen it, thankyou. I presume you stand with Tess Lawrie rather than Mike Yeadon. There seems to be a lot of discussion around the traps about what has happened to him.
One minute Ivermectin was a wonder drug ... a very safe Nobel prize winning drug ... for humans ... then I noticed 'Tim Truth' saying Ivermectin was very dangerous ... and after watching his videos about it, I was very suspicious, and felt he had been somehow compromised ... I stopped following his videos ...
Then people started to say Vitamin D was dangerous ... again, I smelt a rat ...
Now Ivermectin is being discredited by others ...
I have a lot of respect for Mike Yeadon ... even more for Tess Lawrie ... I will try to search out the actual evidence ... but I suspect that very useful things are being discredited suspiciously ... and, in the first instance, we should go back to a pre-Covid point to evaluate whether to use a drug/supplement etc
However ... I would point out the current 'turmoil' in the World ... which is very deliberate ... and that we are headed into WWIII within 6 months ... so we really have 'bigger fish to fry' if most of the people on this planet are to survive the lethal mRNA jabs
We have completed Act I ... of the 3 Act 'endgame' we are in ... and if we allow them to unleash Acts II & III ... we will no longer have a voice ... or any future ...
I agree with you, except that I think finding a "cure" for the deadly toxins now in our blood, whether vaxxed or not, is first priority. We cannot fight back if we are too sick to think clearly and too sick to take any action. We have to at least boost our health, even if only temporarily, to keep ourselves living effectively for as long as possible. So far, I think nicotine is the best way to sharpen a compromised brain, and maybe to de-sludge our blood.
By all means ... but the 'war' we need to fight ... is not a physical war ... it is an information war ... to wake a sufficient 'critical mass' of the general public up, so as to have a 'voice' ... to force our Govts and MSM to put a stop to what's happening ... namely WWIII and another 'plandemic' ... and the deliberate collapse of the global economy/financial/social infrastructure ... which will be used to cover up the devastation still to come from the 'jabs' ... and make sure no voices are heard ...
Agreed but people are not asleep, they are in denial. Action will only happen if we can present a plan of action. My bit - because that is where I have been forced to go - is to find "the cure". Your bit may be something else, but you will have to give people hope if you want them to "wake up". They are not asleep, they are in denial. You have to give them hope that they can actually do something within their health and financial limitations, so you have to design practical and realistic actions they can take.
There are groups all over Facebook of people either medicating themselves or their loved ones with either or both of Fenben or Ivermectin. There are lots of variations, particularly relating to dose and duration of treatment, but from what I can see, if there is a named person like Joe Tippins, the protocol may work for some but certainly does not work for everyone. I attempted in the early days of my research to make sense of all the conflicting information. I have two articles below on them both. In the end I didn't opt for the Tippins protocol.
I like both Dr. Yeadon and Dr. Tess Lawrie, and while I side with Dr. Tess Lawrie in large part, I believe that Dr. Yeadon does make a good point in saying that ivermectin is significantly correlated with infertility and reduced fertility especially when used for more than two days. The research is convincing but not conclusive. It is probably true. In most cases the benefits of ivermectin are worth the trade-off, especially for people over 40. Young people should be warned about this likelihood.
"They can't be serious can they?"
They are dead serious. IVM threatens Big Pharma and the disease model. What they did to Ivermectin, they have been doing to vitamin D for decades. Think about this,... D3 insufficiency exists worldwide. How is that possible when deficiencies around the world have been established decades ago? https://ohbaby.substack.com/p/what-you-thought-you-knew-of-d3-hardly
Dr. Yeadon has lost his mind... https://substack.com/@ohbaby/note/c-67552347
More on Ivermectin's benefits and safety... https://ohbaby.substack.com/p/why-everyone-should-have-ivermectin
Why hasn't an application for FDA approval of ivermectin as a new anticancer drug been submitted?
Because clinical trials will never be conducted...
https://ohbaby.substack.com/p/why-everyone-should-have-ivermectin
It's clear that many people are unaware that the FDA grants a three-year exclusivity period for new cancer drugs like ivermectin. If ivermectin is applied as a new cancer drug for a new indication, the applicant can secure this exclusivity period, potentially leading to revenues exceeding $10 billion.
It's also clear the majority of FDA funding comes from the Industrial Medical Complex aka Big Pharma. It will never happen. You could bet the house on it.
IVM lost its patent and cost pennies on the dollar. There is no profit to be made. It cost more to package the tablets than to produce the drug. Maybe they can alter the drug and create a new patent? I don't know.
But even still, it would be too much of a huge hit on the cancer industry which is big business.
>>We can trust the millions around the world who have used Ivermectin and who
>>recover with no ongoing health damage, to tell the truth about what healed them.
OK, so why does anyone need to waste more time and effort trying to shame Yeadon (or any other 'big name') into coming clean and doing some 'splainin? No more deferring to "so-called" authority. He's tipped his hand. There's lots of different levels to this psyop, and they have have them stacked high and layered deep - so that if discerning and open minds make it past several, there are always several more that look a little different - already in place; ready to capture and derail them.
We're just going to have to crowdsource the truth and follow our own inner guidance on what works and what doesn't. Not everyone will get it right, or get to a good answer for it in time - but them's the breaks. Sadly, the Darwin awards go out every damn minute of the day for people whose powers of discernment and/or timing were just a little tiny bit off...
"Why does anyone need to waste more time and effort trying to shame Yeadon...?"
Because he is using his 40 years of expertise to spread disinformation. Oh,.. I'm a former Big Pharma exec, in charge of blah, blah, blah, so I know... Dr. Yeadon misleading that church group, saying there is no virus and Ivermectin is toxic, could be very harmful. Strangely, it reminds me of Jim Jones and the "Jonestown" event.
Yup. When nothing and no-one can be trusted for the expertise they are supposed to have any more, we are in a sorry state. We are in a complex society that requires specialties. We cannot each know everything we need to know. We employ an electrician to fix our wiring. We have to learn from specialists, and there is the problem. Which specialists can we actually trust. None it seems, so we are all have to turn ourselves, rapid fire, into oncologists. That’s not going to end well for most of us.
No, it probably won't. And that really sucks. But it's where we're at. We're going to have to all become very versatile 'generalists' in a hurry, and quit outsourcing all the knowledge to 'specialists'. Depending on who programs it (of course), and how well they did so, having the relatively unbiased assistance of a good general AI to help collate all the information that's out there already, like you've done, may be a saving factor.... I think I recall Mike Adams at Natural News & his team started working on a specialized AI knowledge assistant to locate natural cures. Haven't looked in on that in a while. Might be at a stage by now where it's at least semi-usable by the general public ...
One reason I am openly publishing my own journey with ill health, is that, even if I get it wrong, I am adding to the people centred database out there of what works and what does not.
I just got the provisional all clear from my cancer surgeon today. We cannot know, for any individual, whether the anti-parasitic protocols did anything at all, but we can know that they might. I am 9 months down the track from a melanoma excision where margins were left behind, at which stage I started taking anti-cancer protocols, and 3 months down the track from a breast cancer lumpectomy where margins were also left behind. There is currently no evidence of regrowth of either tumour, and no evidence of metastases. From here apparently, I have an 80% chance of no recurrence. I have to make up my mind whether to stay on therapeutic doses of anti-cancer protocols, or drop to maintenance doses, or change tack altogether to self-administered metabolic treatments based on mitochondrial health - all without the help of a practitioner, and only AI to help me sort out a the most cost effective long term protocol. A bit of intelligent human help would be nice, but it is not out there to be had.
(PS, I see you are into the woo. That is what has gotten me through this period of my life, and I have been having to trust my intuition like never before.)
You have no idea how much i admire you Christine🌹You are helping many. Daily prayers for you.
>>I just got the provisional all clear from my cancer surgeon today.
Fantastic news! I am very glad to hear that. You are a very strong woman and your persistence has paid off ! I guess you've probably seen Uncle Clif's several pages of notes on beating cancer with things like fenben, etc. If not check out his 'stack...
I think being one with the 'woo' is our original natural state, but one that has largely been programmed out of 'normies' over the centuries. I've been cultivating my intuition for many years. It isn't always right, or right on time, but I have found that the more you trust it, the better it gets over time...
Yes. When we are confronted with cancer, we realise very quickly whether or not we are reconciled with death, and we realise very quickly that there is no-one there to save us, except whatever is represented by our own intuition. I learned, through this episode, that my intuition often speaks to me through the voice of a small child or belligerent teenager. It’s not often sweet and refined and oozing spiritual ascendancy when the sh** hits the fan.
The cancer industry and the sickness industry generally, forces us to make uninformed life or death decisions on the fly. This is when my spoilt child voice takes over and I can seem churlish or apparently irrationally stubborn, with my reaction to whatever I am being pressed into doing against my will. Even I do not know why I am turning into a donkey defiantly refusing to move or accept or do anything they want.
But it seems to have worked and so far has navigated me back out of ICU with what they called covid and now back out of the threat of two different cancers going rogue throughout my body.
My most critical learning through this time is to trust those apparently immature voices. to step back from the medical bullies, and take my own good time to let the problem sit until I wake up with a clarity on my course of action - even if that takes months with doctors telling me I will die if I take even hours or days. I’m still here. I WAS RIGHT! THEY WERE WRONG.
Now I just have to keep it up. I have to stop the old cancers from re-growing, I have to stop new cancers from growing, and I have to “cure” whatever this accursed long covid is.
>>my intuition often speaks to me through the voice of a small
>>child or belligerent teenager. It’s not often sweet and refined
>>and oozing spiritual ascendancy when the sh** hits the fan.
LOL - mine is never sweet either - and it often talks junk to me if I'm fixing to do something I shouldn't. But it probably needs to, in order to get my attention. Just keep listening and yours will keep guiding you.
Ivermectin works for whatever covd is. My holistic MD, yes a MD, had one of his patients take it in the hospital because she was dying and couldn't breathe. Her husband snuck it in to hospital. Then when she got out they tried to take his license away and the doctor had to go to court. The lady showed up and said he saved her life. End of story. He got to keep his license. Shame on everyone who turned this Holistic MD in. It is her body and she has the right to say yes or no to ivermectin. She won!
Considering that Big Pharma and the blackmailed medical profession have been poisong humanity for decades I would put my money on Michael Yeadon
I have 3 dead family members and a 2 dead friends and a daughter injured by vaccination in her teens leaving her with SLE and her body destroyed by steroids
A lot of us were putting our money on Michael Yeadon, but also Tess Lawrie, so to find the two of them at loggerheads is shocking. The study Yeadon uses to prove his point is clearly a nonsensical research study, as so many of the recent ones are, and he should have been able to see. It is impossible that he could not see the fallacies in the study. Even non-medical people like myself can tear the study apart, and Tess Lawrie has done just that.
In the very early days when we first started getting sick with something and dying, Tess Lawrie told us that she had been using Ivermectin to treat cancer - long before supposed covid - and she noticed that her cancer patients, already with compromised immune systems, were fighting off supposed covid symptoms with ease and none of them got seriously sick or hospitalised. She put 2 and 2 together, realised that the ivermectin was treating whatever covid was and started using it on her non-cancer patients as an early treatment. I don't know the source of this story now - it was too long ago, but as Tess Lawrie is one of the few doctors on the scene who have not proven themselves to be everything bad, stupid, dishonest, or straight out evil, I don't want to let go of my last remnant of trust in the human race.
I can tell that the research paper in question is seriously compromised so why is Mike Yeadon using it to attack Tess Lawrie. It makes no sense.
First,... Congrats in taking control of your own health.
Dr. Yeadon will never debate Tess. She would rip him a new butthole and he knows it. You saw what she did to Dr. Andrew Hill.... https://drtesslawrie.substack.com/p/my-letter-to-dr-andrew-hill-video
And lastly, studies on IVM have no weight or significance any longer. They can't supersede 40 years of recorded history... https://substack.com/@ohbaby/note/c-67552347
You can deny it but your whole article is touting ivermectin to treat cancer. You have no proof whatsoever. The rulers of the world are preventing research of all kinds that needs to be done, allowing only that which supports their narrative. You need to look at evidence yourself and not rely on “experts” to do the work for you.
If it works for someone then it works. PERIOD.
So let's clarify what you are saying. It is up to cancer patients who are unable to afford specialist cancer care, to read and interpret all the serious medical studies pertaining to the of-the-shelf treatments we can access for ourselves, and sort which is honest and which is ludicrous? This is no longer the job of the medical professionals? And when we try to do just that, and find the medical professionals are all tearing one another to shreds in public spats, with what any moron can see are spurious arguments, we, who have no choice but to self-medicate, have to wade through their nonsense to find out what is truth and what is lie? This is no longer the job of the medical professionals? And we have to adjudicate while these medical professionals behave like spoilt brats, unable to take their disputes into a private forum and resolve them like we once though all professionals were able to do? It is no longer a requirement for a medically trained person to behave like a grown-up, let alone a professional and educated grown up?
Sure. You must be so proud to belong (if you really do) to such a debased profession.
And just as an aside, I have chosen not to use Ivermectin to treat my two different cancers that developed after a two week stint in ICU with what was called covid. But I know many who are, and they don't need clearly disturbed human beings like Mike Yeadon smashing their hopes without giving them an alternative. He might be right about Ivermectin. I have no way of knowing, and nor do any of the ordinary people forced to self-medicate for turbo cancers, but I do know he has no right to smash peoples faith in a treatment, supported by clearly substandard research, without giving them an alternative.
I’m not taking responsibility for the whole medical profession. I was shocked that the vast majority of doctors I was still in contact with (I retired long ago) went along with the obviously false Covid narrative and that they allowed themselves to be injected, and in many cases encouraged their patients and others to be injected. The reasons why they did that could certainly fill many books.
Clinical MD’s are not the drivers of new cancer treatments. That unfortunately is in the hands of large institutions like the NIH and large pharmaceutical companies because the costs are so high. The federal institutions are certainly captured and corrupt, and many, if not most of the pharmaceutical companies are as well. So we can’t rely on them. That leaves us with various medical freedom luminaries, many of which have an extraordinary output of material that makes one wonder how that all gets done. They line up all over the place, from Ardis with his snake venom theories, McCullough who was opposing the vaxx for the young but advocating it for the elderly (I attended a talk by him in late 2021 when he did just that), to Kory who came from nowhere to be brought to the US Senate to advocate for IVM, but when one looks at his timeline exactly it makes no sense. If the rulers of the world decided to have a major depopulation event and do it with injections and poisoned “drugs”, would it surprise you that they would place a few of their chosen misleaders into the movement of people they knew would develop in opposition to their plans? I can’t say for sure exactly what role Yeadon or Lawrie are playing. I’ve read much more of his stuff than hers but I take nothing as gospel and recommend the same to others. Is it difficult to read a scientific article and come to a conclusion? Yes, it often is, but unfortunately you and I have no alternative than to try to read those tea leaves and decide for ourselves. A new dimension has been added because of the blanket propaganda we are facing and the fact that many (most?) editorial boards of scientific journals appear to be corrupt as well. I agree with you that as far as cancer patients are concerned they have been put in a very difficult position, which I think is probably by design. Especially as I think the injections are causing a large amount of cancer and that that may well increase. Finally, I stand by my recommendation not to depend on any of these “heroes”.
You cannot impute from anything I have said that I rely on any heroes. I have been slamming them all for months in my posts. I would like to think that maybe one of them is honest, intelligent and telling the truth, but i have yet to see the evidence of that.
Because of severe censorship anecdotal evidence is what we are being limited to having as a way to evaluate phenomena at the present time. That does not make it reliable. Common sense should make one seriously question any drug that is being touted to treat viruses effectively and then marching on to treat cancers of all shapes and sizes and hue. Additionally, internet appointed “luminaries” such as Kory, McCullough, Malone, and others, clearly fifth columnists helping get the shots into the arms, have been the biggest proponents of IVM. You have made a lot of claims in this article about the usefulness of IVM in treating late stage, hospitalized Covid patients, but you have offered zero proof, not even a single anecdote. Furthermore, every single claim you offer that it treats cancer is qualified by “may”, “reputed to”, “thought to be” kind of qualifiers, without exception. That means absolutely nothing and raises a great deal of suspicion, as it should. I find your arguments unconvincing at best, and probably deceiptful. This is being written by an MD who treated scores of people of with IVM but quickly realized “Covid” itself required no treatment by IVM, and explained to patients that we were hopefully treating “Long Covid”. When I began to see visual disturbances caused by IVM I stopped using it altogether. Those had not been reported in the internet literature so I was quite surprised. You are joining Chris Cuomo in touting IVM. Look in the mirror and question what you are up to!
I'm not touting anything. I am telling the supposed experts to grow up, stop bickering like 5 year olds, and get on with providing reliable advice to those of us dying without any kind of competent medical help. The last thing that seems to matter to any of you is sick people. We pale into insignificance in the blinding light of your ego battles.
I disagree with the premise that reporting side effects is "anti" anything. I think people deserve to know the truth and make informed decisions.
Thanks for the discussion of mechanisms of action for Ivermectin.
I have added your article as an update to mine from last year.
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/pfizer-knew-ivermectin-protects-against
Seen it, thankyou. I presume you stand with Tess Lawrie rather than Mike Yeadon. There seems to be a lot of discussion around the traps about what has happened to him.
Can't get into FAERS just now to look at the latest Deaths and Injuries from Ivermectin.
They are probably doing another update.
https://www.fda.gov/drugs/questions-and-answers-fdas-adverse-event-reporting-system-faers/fda-adverse-event-reporting-system-faers-public-dashboard
It has a smaller toll than many other drugs
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/deaths-and-birth-defects-from-the
One minute Ivermectin was a wonder drug ... a very safe Nobel prize winning drug ... for humans ... then I noticed 'Tim Truth' saying Ivermectin was very dangerous ... and after watching his videos about it, I was very suspicious, and felt he had been somehow compromised ... I stopped following his videos ...
Then people started to say Vitamin D was dangerous ... again, I smelt a rat ...
Now Ivermectin is being discredited by others ...
I have a lot of respect for Mike Yeadon ... even more for Tess Lawrie ... I will try to search out the actual evidence ... but I suspect that very useful things are being discredited suspiciously ... and, in the first instance, we should go back to a pre-Covid point to evaluate whether to use a drug/supplement etc
However ... I would point out the current 'turmoil' in the World ... which is very deliberate ... and that we are headed into WWIII within 6 months ... so we really have 'bigger fish to fry' if most of the people on this planet are to survive the lethal mRNA jabs
We have completed Act I ... of the 3 Act 'endgame' we are in ... and if we allow them to unleash Acts II & III ... we will no longer have a voice ... or any future ...
https://windowsontheworld.substack.com/p/why-kiwis-are-doomed
regards
pb
I agree with you, except that I think finding a "cure" for the deadly toxins now in our blood, whether vaxxed or not, is first priority. We cannot fight back if we are too sick to think clearly and too sick to take any action. We have to at least boost our health, even if only temporarily, to keep ourselves living effectively for as long as possible. So far, I think nicotine is the best way to sharpen a compromised brain, and maybe to de-sludge our blood.
By all means ... but the 'war' we need to fight ... is not a physical war ... it is an information war ... to wake a sufficient 'critical mass' of the general public up, so as to have a 'voice' ... to force our Govts and MSM to put a stop to what's happening ... namely WWIII and another 'plandemic' ... and the deliberate collapse of the global economy/financial/social infrastructure ... which will be used to cover up the devastation still to come from the 'jabs' ... and make sure no voices are heard ...
pb
Agreed but people are not asleep, they are in denial. Action will only happen if we can present a plan of action. My bit - because that is where I have been forced to go - is to find "the cure". Your bit may be something else, but you will have to give people hope if you want them to "wake up". They are not asleep, they are in denial. You have to give them hope that they can actually do something within their health and financial limitations, so you have to design practical and realistic actions they can take.
I've tried with a few deniers and have been told I'm a snake oil salesman 🤦🏻♀️🤷♀️😆. Can't lead a horse to water.
Hi Christine,
Joe tibbins of mycancerstoryrocks.com is the best source of fenben and cancer info I know of.
There are groups all over Facebook of people either medicating themselves or their loved ones with either or both of Fenben or Ivermectin. There are lots of variations, particularly relating to dose and duration of treatment, but from what I can see, if there is a named person like Joe Tippins, the protocol may work for some but certainly does not work for everyone. I attempted in the early days of my research to make sense of all the conflicting information. I have two articles below on them both. In the end I didn't opt for the Tippins protocol.
Why would you not try it? I have used them both for over a year.
Please read my stack. Nowhere have I said I did not take this or any other protocols.
https://curingcoviddiseases.substack.com/p/the-ivermectin-fenbenzadole-vitamin
https://curingcoviddiseases.substack.com/p/the-joe-tippins-fenbendazole-protocol