The anti-Ivermectin crowd, they can't be serious can they?

...can a drug that is supposed to be so safe, really be so dangerous? The implications are horrendous, either way, for all those taking Ivermectin for cancer.

I am unvaxxed

The information provided on this article does not, and is not intended to, constitute medical advice; instead, all information, content, and materials available on this site are for general informational purposes only. 

I am no advocate of drugs. I avoid taking them at all costs. But there are times when even I have to admit that the occasional drug might be helpful, in which case we choose the safest ones. Up until now, everyone has said that Ivermectin is one of the safest drugs in existence with one of the lowest incidences of side effects and harms. It does have some side-effects when misused, but then, so does aspirin.

The current no-virus and no ivermectin stance

Currently we have the “no-virus” and “no ivermectin” stance being taken by Michael Yeadon, which has caused significant debate. He has pitted our two favorite English commentators against one another, himself against Tess Lawrie, forcing her into the position of antagonist, a position she wears with grace and conviction, thankfully, so it is unwise to make us choose. We used to trust them both. Now, Michael Yeadon is forcing us to choose. Hopefully we don’t lose our faith in both as a result.

There are two issues here:

1. Do viruses exist?

2. Does Ivermectin safely treat viruses or anything else?

Tess Lawrie says that Ivermectin used properly treats the virus called covid.

Mike Yeadon says there is no such thing as a virus including the virus called covid, so there was no sickness that was successfully treated with Ivermectin, and that those who are using it to treat the non-existent covid are using a dangerous drug that causes infertility in both men and women, for no good reason, as part of the globalist depopulation agenda. (Phew)

Yup, serious accusations.

Ivermectin and covid

I ask Mike Yeadon and everyone else still talking about Ivermectin and covid to move on. There is a ton of evidence that Ivermectin helped patients who were actually, really, dying of something or other, that was called covid. It helped them recover and get back out of hospital alive. Who cares what it was really treating? It treated something successfully and saved lives. Now let’s move on.

Ivermectin has graduated from treating covid to treating cancer, and is relied upon by many hundreds of thousands of people around the world who are currently self-medicating with Ivermectin for cancer and turbo cancer. And there is a ton of evidence that it can be used very effectively against a whole range of different cancers.

Ivermectin and cancer

Loose words from a once trusted commentator, Mike Yeadon, are destroying the trust that cancer patients are needing to place in Ivermectin. I hope he has a damn good reason. From what I can tell, the research papers he cites are deeply flawed, which he should know, and Tess Lawrie has challenged him to talk through the results of these papers. In all conscience, as a world of cancer patients is depending on him do the honorable thing, he MUST have this conversation with Tess Lawrie, so that those using Ivermectin for cancer can make fully informed decisions on how to proceed.

I am angry that Mike Yeadon has muddled his anti-virus campaign into the anti-Ivermectin campaign, and denied cancer patients their ability to trust what appears to be a very effective cancer treatment.

Anecdotal evidence that Ivermectin works against cancer

There is an almost infinite amount of anecdotal evidence, the best type of evidence in my opinion, that Ivermectin works for a myriad of infections and ailments including cancer, and does very little harm.

Can we trust ordinary people to tell the truth about their own health?

Yes, we can trust people and their anecdotal evidence. We can trust the millions around the world who have used Ivermectin and who recover with no ongoing health damage, to tell the truth about what healed them. We can trust normal people living normal lives to know whether their normal bodies were fixed or harmed by what they took.

Our very existence proves that our ancestors survived everything form the black death to small pox and Spanish flu. And we have inherited their DNA. The fact that we are here at all proves we have good genes, genes that can be trusted to care for us. And we can be trusted to know what helps and what hinders us in the maintenance of our health. We don’t need doctors to deny our understanding of what works for us. If it works, it works. And, for the most part, we know what works safely, what makes us feel better and what makes us feel worse. And we can be trusted to heed the warnings if some therapy is suspect - as long as we are given the facts.

While doctors bicker over what is really trivia,
real people needing real doctors and real medicines continue to die from neglect.

Let’s hear what ChatGPT has to say about the therapeutic effects of Ivermectin on cancer

Christine:

Ivermectin is reputed to have at least 12 mechanisms of action on cancer. Can you list them all please?

ChatGPT:

Certainly! Here is a comprehensive list of the reputed mechanisms by which ivermectin may interfere with cancer growth and metastasis:

1. Inhibition of the WNT/β-catenin Pathway

• Mechanism: Ivermectin is thought to inhibit the WNT/β-catenin signaling pathway, which plays a key role in cancer cell proliferation, survival, and metastasis.

2. Autophagy Induction

• Mechanism: Ivermectin is believed to induce autophagy, a process where cells break down and recycle components, leading to cancer cell degradation and death.

3. Ion Channel Interference

• Mechanism: Ivermectin may interfere with ion channels in cancer cells, disrupting their internal environment and leading to cell death.

4. Inhibition of PAK1 (p21-activated kinase 1)

• Mechanism: Ivermectin is reputed to inhibit PAK1, a kinase involved in cancer cell growth and metastasis, thereby reducing tumor progression.

5. Mitochondrial Dysfunction

• Mechanism: Ivermectin may cause mitochondrial dysfunction in cancer cells, leading to a loss of energy production and inducing apoptosis.

6. Inhibition of STAT3 (Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3)

• Mechanism: Ivermectin is thought to inhibit STAT3, a transcription factor involved in promoting cancer cell survival and immune evasion.

7. Inhibition of AKT/mTOR Pathway

• Mechanism: Ivermectin may inhibit the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway, which is crucial for cancer cell growth, survival, and metabolism.

8. Interference with Tumor Microenvironment

• Mechanism: Ivermectin is reputed to modulate the tumor microenvironment, making it less conducive to cancer cell survival and metastasis.

9. Inhibition of Angiogenesis

• Mechanism: Ivermectin is believed to inhibit angiogenesis, the process of forming new blood vessels that supply tumors with nutrients and oxygen.

10. Inhibition of YAP/TAZ Signaling

• Mechanism: Ivermectin is thought to inhibit YAP/TAZ signaling, which is involved in promoting cancer cell growth and survival.

11. Inhibition of NF-κB Pathway

• Mechanism: Ivermectin may inhibit the NF-κB signaling pathway, which is associated with inflammation, cancer cell proliferation, and resistance to apoptosis.

12. Modulation of Immune System

• Mechanism: Ivermectin is reputed to enhance the immune system's ability to recognize and destroy cancer cells, potentially through the activation of immune cells like T-cells and natural killer cells.

Summary

Ivermectin is reputed to interfere with cancer through a wide range of mechanisms, including inhibiting key signaling pathways (WNT/β-catenin, STAT3, AKT/mTOR, NF-κB, YAP/TAZ), inducing autophagy and mitochondrial dysfunction, modulating the tumor microenvironment, inhibiting angiogenesis, and enhancing immune response. These diverse actions contribute to its potential anti-cancer effects as reported in various studies and anecdotal reports.

Ivermectin and Fenbendazole to treat cancer

You can interrogate ChatGPT to generate a similar and even longer list of the benefits of Fenbendazole, and curiously, very few of the mechanisms of action of Ivermectin and Fenbendazole duplicate, which might explain why they are apparently so effective when used together, for cancer. There appears to be more evidence of toxicity damage from fenbendazole than ivermectin, and if taking either or both, it is recommended that you get regular liver function tests to ensure you are not causing liver damage. Even if readings go out of range, it is often recommended that they will return to safe limits if you pulse the drugs on and off to give the liver resting time, and if you take liver supplements like milk thistle and Tudca.

The Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, Vitamin C and Bicarbonate of Soda protocol

A plea to Mike Yeadon

So please, Mr Mike Yeadon, consider the full implications of your apparently false reporting on the dangers of ivermectin. You could be responsible for many additional years of quality life lost, by those who lose their faith in Ivermectin to treat cancer because of you.

---

Who wants to talk about any of this?

I would love to form a brainstorming group where we throw around the options for healing and allow ourselves to consider novel solutions. Please feel free to message me on chat if you would like to be part of an open-minded brainstorming investigation of just what simple and cheap ways there are to protect ourselves from all this toxicity and repair the damage it has caused.

---

Can you help?

I intend to keep writing of my journey through this rather strange time in my life, and for this planet. As soon as I know, I will share with you, what does and does not work to exorcise this bio-weapon from our bodies and take back some level of control of our lives.

If you think my writings are worthwhile, you can help me get more subscriptions and donations by sharing this article on other social media platforms, and by re-stacking this article in Substack Notes.

Or make a PayPal donation here to help with ongoing medical costs. Every little bit helps. The last donations, thank you, paid for a red light to help me find restful sleep and experimental nitric oxide gummies to see if increasing nitric oxide levels improves my overall health (it does). I now have a non-intrusive blood glucose monitor on the way.