The future of medicine: self-managed protocol based care

During covid we made up for the global shortfall in competent and accessible medical care by devising a new system of care. Now we need to build on that.

I am unvaxxed

For 30 years I did not see a doctor. In the last 2 years I have more than made up for that. I collapsed in April 2022 with what was called covid, and have lurched from potentially deadly health crisis to potentially deadly health crisis since. I have done that at a time when the health system is under stress, and it has become patently apparent to me, during the last two years, that the health system is little more than an empty shell, struggling to function in a way that improves or saves lives. It looks like it is all there, but it is overwhelmed and unresponsive to both medical crises and chronic medical care.

The medicine to which privileged wealthy nations like Australia feel entitled,
now only exists for the rich.

Along came covid, and the system failed even those who could pay for their care, as there was nothing on offer to pay for. We have to approach medicine differently based on the experiences of the last four years since the advent of “covid”.

Assumptions about the future of medicine

These are some assumptions I am working from, compiled as a result of my observations over 4 years, of the medical response to “covid,” and augmented by my own personal experiences of abandonment by the medical system during the last two years.

1. There has been some serious assault on the health of the global population, whether or not it was a wild or manufactured virus, and whether or not there was some other cause.

2. There is a massive marketplace shortfall of doctors willing to engage intelligently with covid and long covid, and before that, with any of the syndromes. This means that the general public globally, except for a privileged few, is left to self-medicate and self-care as best we can. Our local doctors have failed to educate themselves and apply themselves to covid care.

3. This will probably be the way of things in the future, as global medical infrastructure collapses further. When competent medical resources are not available, there will be an increasing demand for “protocol” style treatment regimes for those who cannot access personalised care. An example of this is the protocols that arose during the covid years from groups like the FLCCC, but for a much wider range of ailments and a much wider range of audiences.

4. The published protocols must cater for three market types, those happy with allopathic medicine, those who are willing to use limited aspects of allopathic medicine for crisis care and diagnosis, and those who prefer holistic care and only use natural therapeutics. All three groups have a right to the best quality of care available according to their own preferences.

5. For self-managed medication to be safe and effective, we must know what we are treating and we must fully understand the proposed treatments. The covid era has shown us that when something apparently novel shows up, we have a paucity of diagnostic tools leading to any kind of diagnostic accuracy, and we have a minimal understanding of how to repurpose existing safe treatments for new ailments. Those medical personnel who have the skills to adapt rapidly to new situations must be enabled to do so, in such a way that the massive global audiences are able to find and apply their protocols.

6. Whilst I acknowledge that holistic care that bases itself on the physiology of the customer is infinitely superior to a system that treats individual symptoms or individual diseases out of context, the simple reality is that this form of medicine is too costly in the modern economy for all but the privileged rich. The second best option is a well educated customer base that is trained to understand their own bodies and research their medical options based on their knowledge of themselves.

What covid taught us about the current medical infrastructure

Covid taught us that medical personnel can no longer be trusted.

• No two doctors can agree on diagnostics or treatment of anything.

• Medical administrators and politicians should not be making medical decisions.

• Medical research and publishing is at the very least, incompetent, and at worst, corrupt to the core.

• Drug companies should not be entrusted with anything at all to do with preserving human life.

• Drug company regulators are corrupt beyond redemption and must be replaced with a better system.

Covid also taught us is that:

• The global medical infrastructure is poorly designed and not fit for purpose, and

• the global medical elite is not competent to deal with a global medical crisis.

What covid taught us about how the human race responds to crisis

But covid also taught us that when the global medical infrastructure fails us, we replace it with something new. We did replace the collapsing infrastructure with something novel and closer to the way humans actually work together to solve a problem. We did it rather badly and rather too slowly, because we are not very comfortable with self-organising, but nonetheless we did it. We found a way to save lives.

Now we just have to understand what we have done and work out how we can do it better.

We are in an era of hyper-novelty

Four years after this all started, we must wake up to the fact that nothing is going back to the way it was. As Clif High tells us, we are moving into an era of hyper-novelty when nothing functions the way it used to, and that includes medicine. We have to re-organise.

We survived this collapse, and can survive the next challenge, if we learn from what we did wrong and learn even more from what we did right. We have all the component parts of quality medical care, but we have to put them together differently. We have to design a new system that is fit for purpose, that serves everyone and that does not abandon it’s “customers” when the going gets tough.

Firsts comes diagnostics, then comes treatment pathways

The covid era showed us that no two doctors can agree on anything and when they cannot agree on the diagnosis of what is wrong with us, how can we determine what treatments to use? Four years later there is still no general agreement on:

• what made us sick in the first place,

• what they are and what exactly has caused long covid and long vax, and

• how to treat the long covid, long vax health collapse that is disabling huge proportions of the global population.

Some doctors and researchers have worked really hard on trying to diagnose what is wrong with us, and what treatments might help us, but they have been unable to reach any consensus. What covid, long covid and long vax really are, is becoming more confused over time, as more variables and options are discovered, and more doctors and researchers develop their own pet theories. This leaves sick people in an impossible situation.

Here are a few outstanding questions that I need to have answered if I am to have any chance of saving my own life. If there is no consensus on diagnosis there can be no consensus on treatment. Here is some of the nonsense we are dealing with. Let’s sort it out, once and for all!

The virus or no virus debate

1. It must be provable, one way or another, whether or not viruses exist. Do viruses exist or not? Stop the bickering and look at the facts! It can’t be that hard!

2. If viruses do exist and if the current virus itself is persistent:

   1. what is the most effective prescription (doctor only) medication for this specific virus on the market?

   2. what is the most effective over the counter treatment for this specific virus on the market?

   3. Ivermectin has been shown to be successful in treating those hospitalised with what was called “covid” so is Ivermectin treating a virus or is it treating something else? If something else, what is it treating exactly?

3. If viruses do not exist, what else might have caused the standard symptoms of pneumonia and hypoxia experienced by many hospitalised with what was called covid? Medical procedures could not have caused the pneumonia as patients (such as myself) were admitted to hospital with double pneumonia and hypoxia. We did not develop it from the treatments we received.

4. What actually killed those diagnosed as covid positive, a virus or a bacterial pneumonia or something else altogether?

   1. Could Ivermectin have been treating bacterial pneumonia?

Why I need to know the answers to these questions
I need to know in case I experience the symptoms of “covid” again, and need to self-medicate. If I get sick again, four years in, I should have the option of taking the most effective treatment. Will I take black market Ivermectin, will I take some specific prescription anti-viral offered by a doctor, will I take a natural anti-viral such as elderberry, or will I be treating something other than a virus?

I need an expert to name a diagnostic test to confirm what is wrong with me, and document both the prescription only and over the counter treatment protocols.

The long covid and long vax debate

We are dealing with three potentially quite different population groups:

• the vaxxed who subsequently get long vax,

• the vaxxed who subsequently get covid and then get a composite long vax and long covid,

• the unvaxxed who get covid and/or develop long covid.

Both the vaxxed and unvaxxed are dealing with persistent and disabling symptoms of ill health. These groups have potentially different symptoms and potentially different treatments.

1. Is long covid (in those who are not vaxxed) caused by:

   1. some form of live virus persisting in the body?

      1. If yes, what can be done to get rid of it from the body?

   2. Is it caused by the spike protein of a wild virus persisting in the body?

      1. If yes, what pathology test should be administered to prove its presence at unacceptable levels in the body?

      2. If yes, what is the best way to remove it?

      3. Is the ACE2 receptor significant and is there some repair necessary so it resumes its normal function?

      4. If it is neither a live virus nor the spike protein, in the unvaxxed, what else might be causing the symptoms of long covid?

   3. Is it caused by some form of nanotechnology that has entered the system by some process other than the vax?

      1. If yes, how did that nanotechnology get into our bodies and how do we avoid it in the future?

      2. If yes, what tests do we need to run to detect the existence of nanotechnology at damaging levels in the body?

      3. If yes, what is the best way to remove the different types of nanotechnology from the human blood and if necessary, elsewhere in the human body?

2. Is long vax caused by ingredients in the vax and if so:

   1. is the manufactured spike protein contained in the vax implicated in long vax?

      1. If yes, what pathology test should be administered to prove its presence at unacceptable levels in the body?

      2. If yes, what is the best way to remove it?

      3. Is the ACE2 receptor significant and is there some repair necessary so it resumes its normal function?

   2. Is long vax caused by the various forms of nanotechnology including graphene oxide that were inserted into the body via the vax?

      1. If yes, what tests do we need to run to detect the existence of nanotechnology at damaging levels in the body?

      2. If yes, what is the best way to remove the different types of nanotechnology from the human blood and if necessary, elsewhere in the human body?

   3. Is it possible for vax spike protein or nanotechnology to pass from one person to another via shedding?

      1. If yes, what is the best way to protect ourselves from shedding?

   4. What are the risks of transfer of a live virus, spike protein or nanotechnology via blood and blood transfusions?

Why I need to know.
I need to know what tests to get a doctor or private pathology to run to definitively diagnose what is causing my long covid symptoms and I need to know how to treat those demonstrated causes.

And if I opt for surgery I need to know if I agree to a blood transfusion and under what conditions.

How important are other forms of toxicity to overall health decline?

1. Is there any other chemical, metal or heavy metal exposure implicated in loss of health over the last four years, potentially but not necessarily or exclusively from chem trails?

   1. If we suspect toxicity, what tests should be conducted to detect the full spectrum of toxic chemicals, metals and heavy metals?

   2. If toxicity is detected, how do we get rid of if from our bodies? We need a therapeutic resource to help us target a particular toxin with a particular drug or self-administered off the shelf detox protocol.

2. Is there any serious evidence of snake venom entering the human system?

   1. If there is, how is it entering our system?

   2. In what way are nAChRs important, if at all?

   3. What are the proven treatments for snake venom poisoning and repair, if necessary, of the receptors?

3. What is the potential role of dirty electricity and 5G?

   1. How do we identify what impact dirty electricity and hostile EMFs may be having on overall health?

   2. And how do we adequately repair the damage and protect from it.

Why I need to know.
I need to know what tests to get a doctor or private pathology to run to definitively identify what kind of toxic overload I may be carrying and I need to know how to detox those demonstrated toxins.

What other ailments and imbalances can come under the heading of long covid or long vax?

There are many ailments that are no longer being effectively dealt with by the current medical infrastructure and which have become increasingly common since long covid. These ailments are diagnosed and treated according to previous diagnostic systems, but they have eventuated as part of long covid. Heart failure, blood clots and turbo cancers are some of the most serious of these.

Treatment protocols are an option for these disorders as well, particularly for the disorders for which traditional treatment options are failing. For each of these other ailments we have to know what diagnostic tests are available, how to interpret those tests, and how to target the ailment with various drug based or off the shelf treatments.

I note that the FLCCC website, which originally had only covid, long covid and long vax protocols, has now branched out into a protocol for Type 2 diabetes, still exclusively for doctors to apply as it includes prescription only drugs, but it is a start.

The idea of healing protocols is expanding beyond its origins.
It’s time to formalise it as a legitimate way of delivering medicine.

We need a new approach to medicine

We need a protocol based system for delivering health care

An imaginative and caring team of doctors could be inventing and developing a new approach to medicine, by creating healing protocols in their areas of specialty, publishing them free of charge on the internet, and allowing the customer to choose the options they consider best for themselves - true “informed consent”.

We need a change in the medical mindset

The most critical and difficult issue to solve will be the demand by doctors that only they can make informed medical decisions and that the customer has to simply do as they are told according to the prejudices of a single doctor at a single point in time.

For doctors to be open to a protocol based “let the buyer beware” approach, they must we willing to accept that they are not the single source of truth for their customers, that there are competing theories and practices, and that the customer has the right to choose between care models and specific practices to manage their own health issues. The customer manages their own care, and the doctor delivers the services they require.

The central principle must be “informed consent“

Let’s face it, there never has been and could never have been “informed consent” in the current medical system. Doctors demand obedience and the medical system that surrounds them is premised on that obedience. How may customers know that the drug they have just been prescribed will give them other illnesses in the long run, and how many know there are viable and safe alternatives? How many are given the full lowdown on medical procedures they are about to undertake, the risks of those procedures and the potentially viable and safe alternatives? There never has been “informed consent”. Let’s devise a system where the customer can be informed, in the simplest and most supportive way, in order to give true “informed consent”.

We will need to deal with complexities eventually

Of course, there are many complexities, particularly for crisis care, but this model could be applied at least initially for many, most or all chronic long term ailments and treatments, and developed from there, based on experience.

There will need to be a way of generating income

Income could be generated by providing additional consultancy to those who can afford to pay for help implementing a chosen protocol, or by selling support products. Each doctor is an independent owner of their own protocols and gets to promote their own ideas, with a basic “let the buyer beware” (within reason) approach. GPs with less imagination can use and promote published protocols to their customers. Or customers could take protocols to their GPs and ask them to administer the chosen protocol, and the GP can say no if they think it is unsafe. True “informed consent”.

We already have a starting model to base this on

The FLCCC is a good starting model to base this development on. As it only currently serves the privileged and those who can access doctors to write prescriptions, it needs to be both broadened to accommodate natural approaches, and extended to include other common long covid related diagnostics, ailments, and treatments, to make it more inclusive.

In conclusion

Only when doctors admit that the system to which they have belonged has failed the general public to an extraordinary degree, can we think about what will serve us better. This article is my start. It’s time (for me) to stop whingeing and work out how to move on.

---

Can you help?

I intend to keep writing of my journey through this rather strange time in my life, and for this planet. As soon as I know, you will know what does and does not work to exorcise this bio-weapon from our bodies.

If you think my writings are worthwhile, you can help me get more subscriptions and donations by sharing this article and on other social media platforms, and by re-stacking this article in Substack Notes.

Or make a PayPal donation here to help me with ongoing medical costs for a range of rather nasty ailments. Every little bit helps.