(12) Is it possible that 5G is making our biofilm more resistant to biofilm disruptors?

...and maybe that is why formerly healthy individuals are suffering from a range of bacterial, parasitic and cancerous incursions that are threatening their overall health.

I am unvaxxed

The information provided on this article does not, and is not intended to, constitute medical advice; instead, all information, content, and materials available on this site are for general informational purposes only. 

Introduction

Skip forward to Today’s Brainwave if you already know what biofilm is and does and why it matters.

My current research on biofilm

I am researching biofilm, and I have a lot of unanswered questions. See this article for what those are. I am still buried in finding the answers.

(11) Do you want to survive the next promised pandemic?

For a full introduction to what biofilm is, see the following on-line course

An introduction to the basics of microbial biofilms

And for my overview of why biofilm matters to us see the following sequence of articles where I put the idea of biofilm into the context of treating resistant pathogens.

(4) Part 1 - What goes into an anti-parasitic, anti-cancer healing protocol?

(5) Part 2 - What goes into an anti-parasitic, anti-cancer healing protocol?

(6) Part 3 - What goes into an anti-parasitic, anti-cancer healing protocol?

(7) Part 4 - What goes into an anti-parasitic, anti-cancer healing protocol?

---

Today’s brainwave

5G might strengthen biofilm in some way

I had a brainwave today about why our problems with bacteria, parasites and cancers have worsened since what was called covid, which also coincided with the turning on of 5G.

The question I ran on Google, was “does 5g help biofilm develop?”

And this article was returned.

MODULATION OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS BIOFILM BY ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION

This is the Abstract.

“Mobile communication systems are undoubtedly an environmental source of electromagnetic radiation (EMR). Although the direct health effect of a cell phone to human is still elusive, the effect to unicellular organisms is rather apparent. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of EMR on development of bacterial biofilm. Microtitration plates with four strains of Staphylococcus aureus were exposed to electromagnetic field of frequencies 1-5 GHz, which are used in mobile phones. The results showed mostly the inhibition of the development biofilm activity at frequencies 1, 2 and 3 GHz, however the significant stimulation of biofilm development occurred at frequencies 4 and 5 GHz. Our observations demonstrate that EMR exposure produced modulation effects on bacterial biofilms, which are very important in commensal and pathogen bacteria.”

And the following article, from which the image above was taken, talks more about the impact of waves and wave lengths on biofilm.

Wave physics encourages bacteria to grow biomaterials

So what are the implications?

I cannot tell from this if biofilm just speeds its development or whether it also changes the nature of the end product, but either way, we either have to:

1. increase the rate of biofilm disruption by consuming more or stronger biofilm disruptors

2. or we need to become aware of which biofilm disruptors still work on the new improved (5G) version of biofilm.

The paper quoted above is telling us that, at lower levels, EMFs might even slow biofilm development but at higher levels they stimulate biofilm development. There seems to be a reasonable level of research available on how to use the lower levels of EMF exposure to deliberately disrupt biofilm, but I have found very little on how the higher levels of EMF exposure, to which we are all now subject, might change either the quantity of quality of biofilm development.

Can you help me find more research papers on these questions,
particularly if you have a better understanding of either EMFs or biofilm than I do?

Why do we need to know?

We are experiencing an increased rate of bacterial, parasitic, and cancerous diseases, since the advent of the covid era, which may have become resistant to their normal treatments because they are protecting themselves with bigger, better, stronger biofilm. At this point we barely pay any attention to normal pre-covid biofilm, so we must start by developing a basic understanding of biofilm, but it might be necessary to adapt very quickly to the idea of super duper biofilm needing super duper biofilm disruptors.

This all matters to us because it is possible that everything changed when 5G was turned on. It is possible that many bodies, whose biofilm disruption capacities were nicely balanced, are now seriously out of whack. Once, pathogens could not develop into destructive colonies, and the human immune system could identify and kill them when they did arise. But they have now lost their capacity to disrupt the new and improved version of biofilm. The solution might be quite simple - just add more or stronger biofilm disruptors to our diets.

Trouble is, we don’t really know what that means.

A reminder as to what biofilms are

• Biofilms are made up of sticky stuff and debris either manufactured within or already resident within a person's body.

• Bacteria, parasites and tumours can wrap themselves up with biofilm to render themselves invisible to the immune system.

• Bacteria, parasites and tumours can wrap themselves up with biofilm to render themselves impervious to the anti-pathogenic treatments applied to them.

• Biofilm disruptors consumed from external sources can break down the biofilm and render the pathogen visible to the immune system.

• Biofilm disruptors consumed from external sources can break down the biofilm and render the pathogen accessible to the anti-pathogenic treatments applied.

A reminder of my major outstanding questions on ordinary, every day biofilm.

• Question 1 - Is all biofilm for all kinds of pathogens across all types of human body the same?

• Question 2 - Are all biofilm disruptors effective against all forms of biofilm?

Can you help me answer these questions?

My big dream given that I am confronting several potentially deadly diseases simultaneously

While I was scanning the web for information on apricot kernels - I am looking for a protocol that includes them, I came across a website for alternative treatment clinics in Mexico. What would I do if I had enough money to fund it? I would go to one of those clinics and then see about living out my days somewhere bright, and colorful and joyful.

Two nights later I had a dream where I was walking down narrow cobbled streets lined with street vendors selling bright embroidered fabric items, actually more like Bolivia than Mexico. There were two other women with me and we were chattering happily. I asked them if I could afford to live there, and they told me I could choose between any of three rooms, now, today - far from luxury but “soft” feminine rooms decorated in lots of soft colourful fabrics. I woke up seriously excited and happy.

So how can I do that? How can I make enough income to fund me to a clinic in Mexico and from there, to who knows where?

Can you help?

I intend to keep writing of my journey through this rather strange time in my life, and for this planet. Hopefully my story becomes exciting as I cross normal barriers to find solutions. As soon as I know, you will know what does and does not work to exorcise this bio-weapon from our bodies.

If you think my writings are worthwhile, you can help me get more subscriptions and donations by sharing this article and on other social media platforms, and by re-stacking this and subsequent articles in Substack Notes.

And if you see value in me sharing my journey, and would personally like to help me get to Mexico where I can find the natural treatments that are illegal in the West, you can make a one-off donation through PayPal below. (With thanks to those who have already donated.)