Part 1 - How do we ever know the truth about what ails us?
...when we don't know which medical professionals on Substack and anywhere else are telling the truth and which are lying? [Significantly edited and republished 13/05/2024]
I am unvaxxed
The information provided on this article does not, and is not intended to, constitute medical advice; instead, all information, content, and materials available on this site are for general informational purposes only.
For those who got sick, including me…
For some of us, knowing who is truthful and who is lying, and who has it right and who has it wrong, is very personal. It is a life or death decision for us. All these “excess deaths” are not just numbers, they are people like me who are dying because either no-one knows how to save us or no-one is even trying to save us. I am one of those people, and MY LIFE MATTERS - to me!
Some of us got sick with some disease we had never experienced before, and for which all the treatments we knew of, failed. Many, like me, were not vaxxed.
I am attempting to make sense of the jumble of theories we are being fed, about what is wrong with us, and I am finding wild supposition and contradictory nonsense at every turn. How is a mere mortal with no medical training supposed to make any sense of it?
While doctors bicker, and character assassination of one another has become their favoured sport, the bodies of many of us are no longer behaving as they had for a lifetime, and no prior wisdom, allopathic or holistic, is even able to relieve symptoms, let alone slow or stop our health decline. We deserve better!
The Substack Medicos
We had to turn to someone who might be able to help, so we turned to the doctors and researchers here on Substack. What a mistake that was! At the time, we had no choice. There was no-one else offering anything else. However, nothing much has changed in the 4 years since the start of “the covid era”, and we still have few realistic options for treatment. We are still being left to die and the Substack doctors and researchers, bless their little souls, are still all we have. And the bickering and character assassination, and now the empire building, goes on. The one thing that doesn’t seem to matter to them is the suffering of the souls who are dying.
Although I am clearly still dying myself of long covid, whatever that is, I am stable enough to attempt a serious research project, one that should be done by the doctors and medical scientists making buckets of money and seemingly giving very little back. But instead, people like me, without credibility or a significant audience, are still having to sort it all out for ourselves.
The competing theories behind covid and long covid
There are multiple competing theories about what the covid epidemic actually was and what long covid actually is, and for each, the treatments are entirely different, so we really do need to know which of them we should be choosing from, when trying to save our own lives. These are the competing narratives I have found so far and I will discuss the first three more detail below, and the final 4 in a subsequent post.
The mainstream allopathic narrative
The “alternative mainstream allopathic narrative”
The narratives that tell us ALL excess mortality resulted from the jabs alone and there never was any covid or long covid
The narrative that thinks all harms come from the jabs but that those harms may have resulted from shedding from the jabbed to the unjabbed
The parasite narrative
The Bryan Ardis, snake venom and nicotine narrative
The 5G and other forms of dirty electricity narrative
The “frankenbugs”
I am covering the first three in this post, and the remaining 4 in a follow up post.
1. The mainstream allopathic narrative
As far as I can tell, there is no useful mainstream narrative. People got sick, some died, some got well, some survived with some kind of syndrome and as vaccinations have been sold to fix the lot, no-one in mainstream allopathic medicine is even admitting there is a problem. And if anyone is trying to speak out, they are silenced either by firing them from their jobs, or silencing them on all forms of media, or both.
Assumptions
That there is such a thing as the SARS-CoV-2 virus that is able to kill and disable people in its own right.
That there are no effective treatments of any kind for the SARS-CoV-2 virus and that hospital procedures are designed to keep the patient alive until the virus resolves itself or the patient dies.
All patients hospitalised with the SARS-CoV-2 virus can be treated with a single protocol applied to everyone, irrespective of the individual health status of the patient.
That prior vaccinations might have prevented the infection so those suffering are personally to blame, and that follow-up vaccinations might help those who have survived.
That there is no evidence that any form of post viral syndrome exists and so necessarily, there is no treatment. (This is variable as some countries have officially recognised long covid and some have not.)
So from the perspective of those of us suffering this illness or its after effects, there is no effective narrative for us to work with, alongside our GP, and take control back over our health.
The message:
take the jab or roll over and die.
The reality:
take the jab and roll over and die.
2. The allopathic “alternative mainstream narrative”
This is the narrative proposed by allopathic doctors and researchers who swept to prominence on publishing platforms like Substack when they objected to the assumption that there are no effective treatments for covid, and/or that vaccinations are safe and effective. They quickly formed into power blocks and developed their own associations in competition with one another and the existing mainstream power base.
It is important to note that these are allopathic doctors with a profound belief in drugs. They are not naturopathic or holistic practitioners of any kind. Although they may recommend many nutraceuticals in their protocols, these always sit alongside drugs requiring prescriptions, and so are not applicable without a medical doctor on board to write the scripts.
Assumptions - the alternative allopathic mainstream narrative
That there is such a thing as the SARS-CoV-2 virus that is able to kill and disable people in its own right.
That the SARS-CoV-2 virus might have become significantly more deadly when its effects were exacerbated with faulty medical practices and dangerous medical procedures including injections, ventilation and end of life drugs.
That “the spike protein” has been identified and is responsible for the SARS-CoV-2 virus entering the cells.
That there is a post viral phase of the disease called long covid, that is also attributed to“the spike protein” .
That there is a post vaccination syndrome called long vax that is also attributed to“the spike protein” from the injection, in addition to other contaminants of the injections.
These are all part of the alternative allopathic medical narrative. But even amongst this subset of doctors and researchers, there are competing camps.
What they all seem to have in common is their demand for their own freedom from government control. Whilst this might seem like a noble objective during the covid era, where governments absolutely overstepped the mark, it comes with dangers of its own. Each of these groups can be seen as attempting to build a power base so that they, rather than governments, have unbridled life and death power over sick people. There is no guarantee that granting them such freedoms will result in better medicine and better outcomes for their patients. We need to watch for the possibility that this is just a power battle between different elites.
America’s Frontline Doctors
This is an American group.
“The doctor-patient relationship is being threatened. That means quality patient care is under fire like never before. Powerful interests are undermining the effective practice of medicine with politicized science and biased information. Now more than ever, patients need access to independent, evidence-based information to make the best decisions for their healthcare. Doctors must have the independence to care for their patients without interference from the government, media, and the medical establishment.”
According to Wikipedia, who we can trust about as much as we can trust governments and their lackeys:
“America's Frontline Doctors is an American right-wing political organization. Affiliated with Tea Party Patriots co-founder Jenny Beth Martin and publicly led by Simone Gold, the group is opposed to measures intended to control the COVID-19 pandemic, such as business closures, stay-at-home orders, and vaccination.”
They promoted both hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin for the treatment of covid, and the famous Zelenko protocol. That protocol involves both prescription medications, some of which are illegal in some countries, and neutraceuticals. They are only accessible for those with a friendly doctor and unlimited budget.
Beyond that, America’s Frontline Doctors seems to be largely a political and scientific organisation.
The FLCCC Alliance
This group was American in origin but is expanding internationally.
The FLCCC Alliance (The Front Line Covid19 Critical Care Alliance)
“Founded by a group of leading critical care specialists in March 2020, the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) is dedicated to helping prevent and treat COVID, and to help patients take charge of other areas of their health.”
The FLCCC has an array of protocols for different aspects of covid, long covid and long vax, and is now also expanding beyond covid to other ailments, such as Type 2 Diabetes. All their protocols involve drugs and so must be implemented by a practitioner who is willing and legally able to write the necessary prescriptions without losing their licenses to practice. This means they are very limited in application and also very expensive.
They are expanding beyond basic health care in three different ways so far.
The International Fellowship Program
They are expanding their reach internationally through this program.
The Wellness Company, supplements and medical kits
Through this company they are expanding into into online drug and nutraceutical sales with significant funding from drug company cohorts.
The Journal of the FLCCC Alliance
Much corruption in medical publishing has been exposed in recent years and this foray into medical journal publishing is the FLCCC response to it. In their own words:
“Journal of the FLCCC Alliance to expand and advance unbiased multispecialty medical research with emphasis on alternative therapies, use of repurposed drugs, as well as medical ethics and healthcare policies.”
FLCCC Alliance Announces Launch of New Independent Medical Journal
The World Council for Health
This is a British based group.
“The World Council for Health is a non-profit initiative for the people, that is informed and funded by the people. Our global coalition of health-focused initiatives and civil society groups seeks to broaden public health knowledge and sense-making through science and shared wisdom. We are dedicated to safeguarding human rights and free will while empowering people to take control of their health and wellbeing.
There is a better way and we are committed to creating it together with you!”
The Message from the doctors groups:
Find a doctor you can afford,
who is willing to run the recommended tests,
and willing to treat you with the recommended protocols,
comprised of a fortune’s worth of drugs for which they write the necessary prescriptions
and supported by a fortune’s worth of neutraceuticals,
with no evidence provided to support the efficacy of the protocols,
and logistically impossible to organise in most countries and on most budgets.
3. The narratives that tell us ALL excess mortality resulted from the jabs alone and there never was any covid or long covid
For those of us who DID get sick during the covid era with symptoms that were variously called covid and long covid, this argument is irrelevant and is used to effectively troll all attempts to have an intelligent conversation about what is really going on. It has uncoordinated tentacles reaching everywhere but focusing, usually ignorantly and irrationally , on whether viruses really exist, some kind of mish-mash of the germ vs domain theory, and the politics of how viruses have been used to bring about social control.
What matters to the sick is what fixes them
For those of us who did get sick, and who are still dying of an unidentified disease, we could not care less if viruses exist or not and how they have been used politically. We care about what is wrong with us and how to put it right so that we (and perhaps the entirety of the human race), have more than a year or two left to live. We ARE sick and getting sicker, and the human race is being destroyed. Let’s keep our eye on that ball and not let ourselves get distracted by pseudo-intellectual disputes.
If what is ailing us IS NOT the actual injection in origin, and some of us are living proof that it is not, then we still have to understand what is killing us if we are to fix it. Something did hit us hard and is killing us. If that something is not a needle stuck into our arms, and if there is on such thing as a virus, we still need to know what it is. The gaslighting where we are being told it is all in our heads has to STOP. Our challenge is to work out what did hit us hard - if not the injection - and potentially if not a virus - what was it and how to fix it?
The only thing that actually matters is what is fixing our ills. Those of us who used the alternative mainstream protocols when we first got sick know, with certainty, that their protocols are either impossible to apply for all sorts of logistical reasons, and/or do not work effectively when they are applied. I question now whether they were ever intended to work.
4. The narrative that thinks all harms come from the jabs but that those harms may have resulted from shedding from the jabbed to the unjabbed
I find this theory credible but unlikely to stand alone. There seems to be evidence now that aspects of the jabs can be transmitted from one person to another. I have not done a lot of research on this, but the implications are that the unvaxxed are also at risk of suffering from and potentially dying from “long vax” or vaccine injury, the same as the vaxxed. It means that 100% of humanity, with little distinction between vaxxed and unvaxxed is vulnerable to the gene and body altering technology contained in the covid jabs.
This article, written in 2022 confirms that shedding is real, but like much else that is proven, it has not been universally accepted.
Ana Maria Mihalcea has also shown, in multiple posts that there is little difference between the blood of the vaxxed and unvaxxed.
My take on how to survive
I believe currently that what is wrong with us is a composite of some or all of the following 5 narratives, the last four of which I cover in the next article. I believe this, for no better reason, than that their treatments work to some degree.
The narrative that thinks all harms come from the jabs but that those harms may have resulted from shedding from the jabbed to the unjabbed.
There may be a toxicity component resulting from shedding, but I am not currently addressing that except tangentially in my anti-parasitic protocols.
The parasite narrative
The Bryan Ardis, snake venom and nicotine narrative
The 5G and other forms of dirty electricity narrative
The “frankenbugs”
Wish me luck.
Can you help?
I intend to keep writing of my journey through this rather strange time in my life, and for this planet. As soon as I know, you will know what does and does not work to exorcise this bio-weapon from our bodies.
If you think my writings are worthwhile, you can help me get more subscriptions and donations by sharing this article on other social media platforms, and by re-stacking this article in Substack Notes.
Or make a PayPal donation here to help with my ongoing medical costs. Every little bit helps.
You are helping more than you know🌹
I am so sorry you are going through this🕯️
It’s nano particles